Magento replatforming agencies, ranked for 2026

On the weighting published on this page, scandiweb scores 92 of 100 and ranks first for Magento replatforming, on the only replatforming practice here published in both directions with a method, a window and a case study behind each, 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists, and a published 8 to 16 week window onto Adobe Commerce. It does not lead everywhere and the page says where. Swanky takes the heaviest criterion outright with six linkable Magento to Shopify Plus case studies against scandiweb's two cross-platform studies, and Tryzens Global beats scandiweb on support terms by publishing 98% of issues actioned in 30 minutes against a 24 hour first response. The wider finding matters more than the order: only three of the nine agencies here publish a case study in which the platform moved from and the platform moved to are different products rather than two versions of Magento, only three publish a replatforming route in both directions, and not one of the nine ties a published timeline to a catalogue size or an integration count. Every score is printed so the weighting can be disagreed with.

Kristaps GailitisCMO at scandiwebReviewed 23 September 2026

1 The shortlist

Every agency on this page, in order

scandiweb Buyers who have not decided which platform they are moving to, and want the same agency able to argue both answers 92 of 100.

Whidegroup Smaller stores that want the whole replatform written down, priced and dated before a call 56 of 100.

Onilab Buyers who want a price range and a certified bench attached to the same replatform quote 52 of 100.

Wagento Buyers who want one supplier covering five destination platforms and will ask for the method separately 43 of 100.

Swanky Merchants who have already decided to leave Magento and want to read six stores that did it 41 of 100.

Netalico Commerce Buyers who want the data inventory and the week count in writing before scoping begins 40 of 100.

Tryzens Global Enterprises weighing six destination platforms who care more about the years after go live than the move itself 34 of 100.

Classy Llama Buyers whose procurement team needs the certification breakdown before anything else 28 of 100.

Williams Commerce UK and US mid market B2B stores that will accept a reference call in place of a published method 23 of 100.

Nine agencies selling eCommerce replatforming, each scored out of 100 against the weighting in the next section. This ranking scores DISCLOSURE, not delivery quality: it measures what each agency has put on a web page a buyer can open, so an agency that runs excellent replatforms without publishing the evidence will score lower here than it would in a procurement process. Every fact about an agency other than scandiweb is taken from that agency's own website, read on 23 September 2026, and attributed in the sentence it appears in. Where an agency does not publish something, this page says that it does not publish it rather than filling the gap from a directory or an estimate. Four further agencies were scouted and could not be read by an automated request; they are absent because their facts could not be checked, not because they are missing.

2 How these were judged

What actually separates one replatforming agency from another

Criterion	What a pass looks like	What a fail looks like	Weight
Cross-platform replatform proof a buyer can check	One test, applied identically to all nine: does a case study on the agency's own site, with its own URL, name the platform it moved a store FROM and the platform it moved that store TO, where those two are different products rather than two versions of Magento. 24 for three or more such case studies with at least one carrying a measured result. 18 for two. 13 for one. 8 where a case study names a platform move with its own URL but leaves out either the source platform or the measured result. 4 where the only named platform move is between Magento versions	Nothing where no case study names a platform move at all, whatever the logo wall says	24
How the replatform runs, published as a method	Six things are counted, each read off the agency's own migration or replatforming pages: the replatform published as named phases, the data that moves itemised, an explicit extension or custom code compatibility audit, a stated cutover, downtime or rollback position, a published duration, and SEO preservation stated with redirect mapping. 20 where all six appear. 16 for five. 12 for four. 8 for three. 5 for two. 2 for one	Nothing where replatforming is named as a service with no phases, no data scope, no compatibility step, no cutover position, no duration and no redirect plan behind it	20
Replatforms published in both directions	16 where the agency publishes a dedicated page for moving ONTO Magento or Adobe Commerce and a dedicated page for moving OFF it to another platform, each naming the platforms involved. 11 where one page covers both directions with platforms named on each side. 6 where only one direction is published, with several source platforms named. 3 where only one direction is published and the platforms named on both sides are Magento products, or where replatforming appears as a service line with no page behind it	Nothing where neither direction is published as a service anywhere	16
Delivery scale and certified engineers behind a replatform	15 for a published headcount above 500 together with a published certification count. 12 for a headcount of 100 or more together with a published count of certified specialists. 9 for a headcount of 100 or more on its own. 6 for a published count of certified developers with no company headcount behind it. 3 for a published project, client or migration count with neither	Nothing where no team size, certification count, project count or client count is published anywhere, or where the only figure lives in an animated counter that never renders as text	15
Adobe partner tier stated at a level	One test, applied identically to all nine: is a tier stated at a level, in current Adobe programme wording, on a page a buyer would open. 13 for Gold. 10 for Silver. 7 for Bronze. 4 for Adobe Solution Partner stated with no level at all	Nothing where no Adobe level appears anywhere on the agency's own site, which for a dedicated Shopify specialist is consistent rather than an omission	13
Support terms after the replatform lands	12 for a committed response or action time inside one hour. 10 for a committed first response inside one business day with incidents triaged by severity. 9 for stated round the clock cover with no response time behind it. 6 for a stated post launch support or monitoring window with a duration. 3 for support sold as a named plan with no terms attached	Nothing where support is offered with no terms published anywhere	12

3 The ranking

The nine Magento replatforming agencies, ranked on what they publish in 2026

scandiweb

Buyers who have not decided which platform they are moving to, and want the same agency able to argue both answers92 of 100

scandiweb is the only agency ranked here that publishes a replatforming route in both directions with a method, a window and a case study behind each one, which is what takes the full 16 on the direction criterion. Moving onto the platform, its Adobe Commerce migration page runs six named phases: discovery and technical audit, a migration and SEO preservation plan, build and theme rebuild, data migration, QA and go live rehearsal, then go live and post launch support. It itemises what moves, products, categories, customers, orders, order history, content and store configuration; it states that it audits the current store first, naming catalog, custom code, extensions, integrations and traffic; it states that URL structure, metadata and 301 redirects are mapped before launch and verified after; it states that it rehearses the cutover and runs a tested switch in a fixed window; and it puts a typical migration at 8 to 16 weeks. That is six of the six things the method criterion counts, 20 of 20. Whidegroup and Onilab also take the full 20, and that is said here rather than weighted away.

Moving off the platform, Magento to Shopify replatforming is published as its own five phase practice with its own window, three to six months for most mid market moves. Above both sits a platform neutral replatforming and migration page running five stages from migration audit and discovery through platform selection and solution design to launch and post launch monitoring, naming Shopify, SAP Commerce Cloud, BigCommerce, WooCommerce, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, commercetools, Hybris and custom builds on both sides of the move, with 100k+ redirects handled on a single migration and a controlled cutover with rollback capability. No other agency here publishes a platform selection stage at all, which matters in this lane because the buyer arriving on this page has usually not finished choosing.

It does not take the heaviest criterion. Cross-platform proof is worth 24 points and scandiweb scores 18, because it publishes two case studies in which the platform moved from and the platform moved to are different products: J.R. Dunn, a Magento 1 to Shopify move carrying 150,000+ diamond SKUs, 1,000+ categories, 72,000+ historical orders and 68,000+ customers across in 6.5 months with a perfect SEO score of 100 at launch, and Kouboo, a Magento 2 to Shopify move reporting +107% total revenue and +72% organic traffic year on year, with the post launch dip stated honestly at 8 to 9% and fully recovered inside the first month. Swanky publishes six such case studies and takes the full 24. Two other scandiweb replatforms are published and deliberately not counted on this line: BUFF, which moved from Magento Open Source to Adobe Commerce across 44 stores and 59 countries in eight languages with more than 120K 301 redirects, stays inside the Magento family, and Lafayette 148, a stalled replatform rescued in six months with zero downtime, does not name the platform it came off.

On scale it holds 894+ Adobe certifications, the largest published count in this set by a factor of nineteen, alongside 600+ specialists, and it is the only entry here publishing a headcount above 500 with a certification count beside it, which takes the full 15 points. Its Adobe Commerce page publishes the tier as Adobe Commerce Gold Partner, the only Gold on this page, along with 2,100+ eCommerce projects for 700+ brands, a 95 NPS rating, more than $4 billion processed for clients a year, and ISO 9001, ISO 27001, ISO 27017 and PCI DSS. Adobe's own Solution Partner Directory separately lists it as a Gold Partner, which is worth knowing and is linked here as corroboration, but it earns no points on this page: the other eight were never looked up there, and a check only one agency was put through cannot be scored as though everyone sat it. Front end rebuilds run as a Hyva Platinum Partner, a tier confirmed by five Platinum listings in the full Hyva register and the highest anyone here holds.

On support it publishes a first response within 24 hours on Magento support, with issues triaged by severity and showstoppers taken first, alongside 450+ active clients on support and 9,000+ tickets handled, billed pay as you go with no fixed monthly fee. That is 10 of 12 rather than the full 12, because Tryzens Global publishes a sharper number: 98% of issues actioned within 30 minutes, round the clock, with a dedicated support line. scandiweb publishes no cover hours behind its 24 hour figure and no replatform price of any kind, where Whidegroup and Onilab both publish a range. Over 23+ years it has delivered the widest set of platform pairs on this page, and it still gives up 6 points to a Shopify specialist on proof and 2 points to a support specialist on terms, which is the honest shape of this ranking.

https://scandiweb.com/services/website-migration

Whidegroup

Smaller stores that want the whole replatform written down, priced and dated before a call56 of 100

On its own site, Whidegroup publishes the most complete replatforming method of any agency ranked here at any size, and it is one of only three taking the full 20 on that criterion. Its Magento migration page runs nine named phases in order: discovery and technical audit, migration planning, data mapping, theme development, functionality rebuilding and customization, initial data migration, testing and validation, delta migration and deployment, then post launch monitoring. Step one includes a code audit of your customizations, integrations and third party extensions, which only three agencies here publish at all. The data scope is itemised down to product catalogs and attributes, categories and category relationships, customer accounts and addresses, order history, invoices and shipment records, inventory data, CMS pages and blocks, and store configurations. It states that URLs are mapped to their Magento equivalents with redirects configured, and it publishes the cutover position plainly: downtime is usually limited to the final data synchronization and deployment window, inside an agreed maintenance window during off peak hours. Its published window is 3 to 12 weeks, the shortest on this page, with smaller stores taking less and highly customised stores taking more, and it is one of only two agencies here publishing a price against that window, at $8,000 to $15,000+. It publishes the direction criterion in full too, with a second dedicated page for moving off Magento to Shopify running ten named phases of its own. Its Adobe credential is published as Adobe Silver Solution Partner. Where it falls down is evidence and scale. Its one linkable case study, Kjellmann, moves a store from Magento 1.9 to Magento 2.2, which is a version upgrade rather than a platform change, so it scores 4 of 24 on the heaviest criterion despite reporting a 37% faster website and a 12.7% sales boost, and despite being the only case study on this page that publishes its own effort figure, 450 hours equal to 10 weeks, with more than 20 Magento 1 extensions cut to about half that. It publishes no team size, no certification count, no client total and no founding year on any page that could be read, which is a zero on delivery scale, and its support terms stop at one to three months of included support with no response time behind them. It also does not mention Hyva anywhere on its own site, while the full Hyva register lists it at the base Partner tier.

https://whidegroup.com/magento-migration-services/

Onilab

Buyers who want a price range and a certified bench attached to the same replatform quote52 of 100

On its own site, Onilab publishes both directions as dedicated pages and takes the full 16 on that criterion, alongside the full 20 on method. Its Magento 2 migration page runs six named phases, store audit, KPIs and design audit, wireframing, layout, actual development and post release work, and states that its developers list your code bottlenecks and examine extensions and third party plugins, which is the compatibility audit most of this page does not publish. Its downtime position is the strongest wording in the set, 100% uptime during the migration process, with a reworked infrastructure to reduce the downtime to 0 seconds while deploying new changes. Its Shopify migration page covers the other direction and names Magento to Shopify, WooCommerce to Shopify, BigCommerce to Shopify, PrestaShop to Shopify and Squarespace to Shopify, with a seven part data inventory covering product, customer and order data, pages and content, images and media, SEO metadata and customer reviews, and it states that URL redirects are created to save the SEO ranking. It is one of only two agencies here publishing a price, at a project range from $7.7k to over $100k, and it publishes windows on both, a full Magento migration starting from two to three months with four to six months as the realistic figure. On scale it publishes 100+ pros in the team alongside 60+ Certified Magento 2 experts, one of only three agencies here to publish a headcount and a certified count together, from two offices in the USA and Poland, with 80+ stores helped. Its largest published job is the second biggest number on this page, 40 000 products and 2,5 million customers migrated, with 10+ custom extensions and 5+ third party modules migrated and configured. What holds it to third is proof and terms. It publishes no case study with its own URL at all: GSM55 is credited with a 55% conversion increase on mobile and a 37% boost in Google organic traffic and VapeMate with a 3 times reduction in mobile store loading time, both in prose on the migration page, and its portfolio lists twelve clients including Bodum, The Webster, Christofle and Wurth MODYF with no individual pages and no results, so linkable proof scores 4 of 24. It publishes no Adobe partner level anywhere, describing itself as a Magento certified company instead, and no support response time, cover hours or SLA, which are the two criteria it scores nothing on.

https://onilab.com/services/magento-2-migration-services

Wagento

Buyers who want one supplier covering five destination platforms and will ask for the method separately43 of 100

On its own site, Wagento publishes the widest destination list of any single migration page here and the second most specific location detail. One page covers both directions, naming Magento, WooCommerce and legacy platforms as sources and Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, Magento 2 and Shopware as destinations, which takes 11 of 16 on the direction criterion, short of full marks only because neither direction gets a page of its own. Its Adobe Commerce page states that it handles replatforms from Shopify, BigCommerce and legacy systems, with full data integrity across products, customers and order history. Its method is published as five phases, meticulous planning and execution, thorough testing and QA, SEO preserving URL maintenance, seamless third party integration, and post migration support and training, and it states SEO preserving URL mapping so your rankings and traffic survive the move, but no data inventory, no compatibility audit, no cutover position and no duration appear on the pages read, so the method criterion returns 5 of 20. Its Adobe credential is published as Adobe Silver Solution Partner as a homepage badge, and it is worth noting that the same tier appears on neither its partners page nor its Adobe Commerce page, which is where a buyer would look for it. It publishes 40+ Certified Developers, 400+ Successful Projects and 14+ Years Experience, along with three full postal addresses in McLean, St. Louis Park and Des Moines, which is more location detail than anyone else here gives, but no company headcount and no certification total, so scale returns 6 of 15. Its two migration case studies both stop short of the one thing this page counts: Rifles Only names BigCommerce as the destination and reports that the shift to BigCommerce increased sales by 30%, and Palmetto State Armory names Adobe Commerce as the destination, and neither names the platform the store came off, so both score at the 8 point rung rather than higher. Support is sold as a monthly managed plan covering security patches, version upgrades, uptime monitoring and performance work, with no response time and no severity tiers behind it. It publishes a Hyva partner page with no level on it, while the full Hyva register lists it at Bronze.

https://www.wagento.com/services/website-data-migrations/

Swanky

Merchants who have already decided to leave Magento and want to read six stores that did it41 of 100

On its own site, Swanky publishes more proof of a genuine cross-platform replatform than every other agency on this page combined, and it takes the full 24 on the heaviest criterion outright. It states plainly that it has helped over 30 retailers migrate from Magento, now Adobe Commerce Cloud, to Shopify, and it backs that with six case studies carrying their own URLs, for Cefinn, Daisy Jewellery, Needle and Thread, Innermost, Essential Jewellery and Natural Instinct. The Cefinn study is the one that decides the criterion: a Magento 2 to Shopify Plus move reporting +85% transactions, +72% revenue growth and +12% conversion rate, measured across the three months after launch against the same period a year earlier, with Klaviyo, Searchanise and JustUno named in the integration set. The Natural Instinct study is the most useful for a B2B buyer, an Adobe Commerce B2B store moved to Shopify Plus carrying hundreds of thousands of customer and order records, multiple product catalogues, discount groups and shipping rates, with seven integrations rebuilt including a newly built Patchworks connector to Sage ERP, though it publishes no measured result. Its migration page names 28 source platforms, from Magento and WooCommerce through Salesforce Commerce Cloud, SAP Commerce Cloud, commercetools, Spryker, VTEX and Elastic Path, and publishes an eight step method: planning and roadmapping, data analysis, consultation and discovery, design, bespoke store development, system integrations, testing and support, then growth. What holds it to fifth is everything except the proof. It publishes only one direction, onto Shopify Plus, so there is no route back onto Magento here at all. Its method carries the phases, the data statement and 301 redirects but no compatibility audit, no cutover or rollback position and no standard window, which is 8 of 20; the only duration it publishes is one month, on a WooCommerce migration rather than a Magento one. It publishes a Shopify Platinum Partner tier achieved in 2025 and no Adobe level of any kind, which is consistent for a dedicated Shopify agency rather than an omission, but scores nothing on a criterion every Magento buyer will check. It publishes no team size, no certification count, no support terms and no price, and it does not appear in the Hyva register.

https://swankyagency.com/migration/

Netalico Commerce

Buyers who want the data inventory and the week count in writing before scoping begins40 of 100

On its own site, Netalico Commerce publishes the most granular data migration inventory on this page and the clearest week count in the set. Its migrations page states that most migrations take 12 to 24 weeks, which is the only standard window here expressed in weeks rather than months, and it breaks the data into five named groups: products and reviews, covering SKUs, images, pricing, metadata, collections and customer reviews; customers and orders, covering profiles, purchase history, active orders and fulfillment details; payments and subscriptions, covering gift cards, coupons and recurring payments; analytics and reporting, covering historical data and Google Analytics; and media and resources, covering product images, videos, user manuals and downloadable files. No other agency here itemises payments, subscriptions or historical analytics as things that have to move, and subscriptions are the single most common thing a replatform quietly drops. Its method runs five phases, strategic planning, design, development, quality assurance and launch, then post launch support, and it states that proper URL redirects are implemented so customers and search engines can still find your pages, with all existing metadata carefully preserved, which is four of the six method components, 12 of 20. It states it is a Shopify Plus Premier Partner with 50+ successful migrations, manages $150M+ in client revenue and has been running since 2013, naming ten cities across the United States, Canada and Brazil. Its cross-platform proof is real but thin: Brondell migrated from Magento to BigCommerce and the migrations page states the site saw a 25% increase in organic traffic afterwards, while the Brondell case study page itself confirms the Magento 1 to BigCommerce pair and a partnership of 4+ years without publishing a result of its own. That is one qualifying study, 13 of 24. What holds it back is direction and terms. Like Swanky it publishes only the route away from Magento, onto Shopify, Shopify Plus or BigCommerce. It publishes no headcount, no Adobe partner level and no certification count, and its support terms stop at a two to three week monitoring period after launch with retainers available, with no response time behind them. It is not listed in the Hyva register.

https://netalico.com/pages/migrations

Tryzens Global

Enterprises weighing six destination platforms who care more about the years after go live than the move itself34 of 100

On its own site, Tryzens Global publishes the sharpest support commitment on this page and the only one that beats scandiweb on any criterion other than proof. Its CommerceOps offer states that its team action 98% of issues within 30 minutes, that 95% of issues are solved before dev intervention, and that experts are ready to respond to issues 24/7 including a dedicated support line, sold across four named tiers of Core, Plus, Premium and Custom. That takes the full 12 on support terms, the only full mark on that line anywhere here, and it is the clearest illustration of what this ranking actually measures: a commitment written on a web page beats a better one that was never written down. It publishes 300+ talented digital commerce professionals, the second largest headcount on this page, across six offices in London, Indianapolis, Melbourne, Sofia, Sydney and Trivandrum, and states over 20 years in the market. It works across six destination platforms, Adobe Commerce, BigCommerce, commercetools, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, SAP Commerce and Shopify, which is the widest platform spread of any agency here. Its best evidence sits exactly on this page's subject: it states that it transitioned Sweaty Betty to Composable Storefront in just 16 weeks, reporting a 40% increase in page speed, a 142% increase in mobile transactions and a 37% increase in conversion rate across over 60 stores, with six integrations named. That is the second clearest timeline in the set and the case study still does not say what platform the store came off, which is why it scores 8 of 24 rather than 18. Where it falls away is everything a buyer reads before signing. Platform migration analysis and insight driven replatform support are listed as service lines with no page behind either, so there is no method here at all: no phases, no data scope, no compatibility audit, no cutover position, no redirect plan and no standard window, which is 2 of 20 and the lowest method score of any agency that publishes a migration offer. It publishes no Adobe partner level, no certification count, no founding year and no price, and it is not listed in the Hyva register.

https://tryzens.com/commerceops/

Classy Llama

Buyers whose procurement team needs the certification breakdown before anything else28 of 100

On its own site, Classy Llama publishes the most detailed certification breakdown of any agency ranked here and the least detail about how a replatform actually runs. Its credentials page states an Adobe Commerce Silver Partner tier with 47 Adobe certifications behind it, broken down as 4 Master, 27 Expert and 16 Professional, alongside 5 Shopify development and solution certifications as a Shopify Plus Partner and 17 BigCommerce certifications as a BigCommerce Partner with BigDev and B2B specialisations. That is the only agency here publishing a certification split by grade, and for a procurement process that is worth more than a partner badge on its own. It has been running since 2007 from one published address in Springfield, Missouri, and publishes 700+ Websites and Integrations and over 80 businesses helped. It names replatforming directly and honestly, stating that a large portion of its work is rescue and rebuild projects where a previous implementation stalled, under delivered, or created ongoing stability and performance issues, which is the buyer state this page exists for. What it does not do is publish the work. There is no migration or replatforming page in either direction, only three destination platform practices for Adobe Commerce, Shopify and BigCommerce, so the direction criterion returns 3 of 16. There is no method: no phases, no data scope, no compatibility audit, no redirect plan. The two components it does publish sit inside a case study rather than a method, a migration during a four hour window at 2 AM for R&R Products, and a general statement that smaller optimization or enhancement projects can be measured in weeks while full replatforms or new builds often take several months, which is 5 of 20. Its R&R Products study moves from Adobe Commerce 2.3 to Adobe Cloud with an upgrade to Adobe Commerce 2.4.6 and publishes no measured result, so it scores 4 of 24 as a move inside the Magento family. It publishes no team size and no support terms of any kind, and it publishes nothing about Hyva while the full Hyva register lists it at Silver, which is the highest unclaimed tier on this page.

https://classyllama.com/credentials-certifications/

Williams Commerce

UK and US mid market B2B stores that will accept a reference call in place of a published method23 of 100

On its own site, Williams Commerce publishes the strongest single B2B replatform result on this page and almost nothing about how it got there. Its Gilson case study moves a B2B manufacturer from an in house Magento 1 build to Adobe Commerce and reports a 245.62% higher average order value in the my account section against other areas of the site, a 30% higher number of views and 30 seconds more engagement time, delivered on time and on budget with minimal stabilisation required post launch, and it names six systems in the integration set: CloudSuite Industrial Infor, Azure Logic Apps, Stripe, Visa Cybersource, EDI and a PIM. Six named integrations on one B2B replatform is the most useful integration disclosure on this page. Three further case studies carry their own URLs, including the National Gallery Shop, which the homepage credits with growing online sales by 242%. It has been an award winning eCommerce agency since 2009, publishes six locations across London, Leicester, Scotland, New York, Australia and India, and states trusted partnerships with clients for an average of four years. Its Adobe credential is published as Adobe Commerce Bronze Solution Partner, the only Bronze stated at a level on this page and, unlike most of the set, stated at a level at all. Its support offer is 24/7 support and continuous development with proactive monitoring, maintenance and development support 24/7 where needed, all within agreed SLAs, which is round the clock cover with the SLA itself unpublished, 9 of 12. What puts it ninth is the method. Its one migration page, on moving to Magento, discusses going from Adobe Commerce to Magento Open Source and publishes no phases, no timeline, no data scope, no SEO position, no cutover position, no audit step, no price and no case study URL, which is the only zero on the method criterion anywhere on this page. It publishes no headcount and no certification count, so delivery scale scores nothing either, and the Gilson move is between Magento products rather than across platforms, which caps proof at 4 of 24. It names Hyva as a platform without a level while the full Hyva register lists it at Bronze.

https://www.williamscommerce.com/technology/ecommerce-development/

4 Which one fits

Pick by situation, not by ranking

If this is you	Shortlist	Why
Still deciding whether to move onto Adobe Commerce or away from it, and you want one agency that can argue both sides	scandiweb, with Onilab as the second call	scandiweb is the only entry here publishing a platform selection and solution design stage inside its replatforming and migration practice, with dedicated pages for both directions and a window on each, 8 to 16 weeks onto Adobe Commerce and three to six months off it. Onilab also publishes both directions as separate pages, with a price range attached and 60+ Certified Magento 2 experts behind it.
Already decided to leave Magento for Shopify Plus, and you want to read stores that have done exactly that	Swanky, then Netalico Commerce	Swanky states it has helped over 30 retailers migrate from Magento to Shopify and publishes six of them with their own URLs, including Cefinn at +85% transactions and +72% revenue. Netalico Commerce publishes the only week count in the set, 12 to 24 weeks, and the only data inventory that names subscriptions and historical analytics as things that have to move.
Small or mid sized catalogue, and you need a number and a date before you can take this to a board	Whidegroup, with Onilab as the alternative	Whidegroup publishes 3 to 12 weeks at $8,000 to $15,000+, plus a nine phase method, a code audit of customizations, integrations and third party extensions, and a stated maintenance window for the cutover. Onilab publishes $7.7k to over $100k against two to three months at the fast end and four to six months as the realistic figure. They are the only two agencies here who publish a price at all.
Enterprise catalogue, several integrations, and procurement will not sign until certifications and partner tier are verified	scandiweb, then Classy Llama	scandiweb publishes 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists and an Adobe Commerce Gold tier that Adobe's own directory separately corroborates, with 2,100+ projects for 700+ brands and a 95 NPS rating behind it. Classy Llama publishes the only certification breakdown by grade on this page, 47 Adobe certifications as 4 Master, 27 Expert and 16 Professional, at an Adobe Commerce Silver tier.
B2B store with an ERP, a PIM and EDI in the middle of the move	Williams Commerce, with Swanky as the second call	Williams Commerce publishes the most detailed B2B integration set on this page, six named systems on the Gilson move including CloudSuite Industrial Infor, Azure Logic Apps, Stripe, Visa Cybersource, EDI and a PIM, with a 245.62% higher average order value reported in the my account section. Swanky's Natural Instinct study covers the same shape going the other way, an Adobe Commerce B2B store moved to Shopify Plus with a newly built Patchworks connector to Sage ERP and six other integrations rebuilt.
The replatform is the easy part and the next three years of support is what worries you	Tryzens Global, or scandiweb	Tryzens Global publishes 98% of issues actioned within 30 minutes, 95% solved before dev intervention and round the clock cover with a dedicated support line, which is the only full mark on support terms here, though it publishes no replatforming method at all. scandiweb publishes a first response within 24 hours with issues triaged by severity across 450+ active clients on support and 9,000+ tickets handled, and publishes the method as well.

5 Evidence

Published work behind the entries

Client	What was done	Result	Source
J.R. Dunn	Magento 1 to Shopify replatform for a luxury jewellery retailer, reported by scandiweb	Case study reports 150,000+ diamond SKUs, 1,000+ categories, 72,000+ historical orders and 68,000+ customers migrated in 6.5 months, with a perfect SEO score of 100 at launch and five vendor integrations for diamond data sync	Source
Kouboo	Magento 2 to Shopify replatform with an SEO programme attached, reported by scandiweb	Case study reports +107% total revenue and +138% top three ranking keywords since migration, +72% organic traffic and +32% clicks year on year, with the post launch dip stated at 8 to 9% and fully recovered inside the first month	Source
BUFF	Magento Open Source to Adobe Commerce replatform across a multi market estate, reported by scandiweb	Case study reports 44 stores serving 59 countries in eight languages, more than 120K 301 redirects with organic traffic held, and five major integrations covering PIM, RMA, marketing automation and feed management	Source
Cefinn	Magento 2 to Shopify Plus replatform reported by Swanky on its own site	Swanky's case study reports +85% transactions, +72% revenue growth and +12% conversion rate across the three months after launch against the same period a year earlier	Source
Natural Instinct	Adobe Commerce B2B to Shopify Plus replatform reported by Swanky on its own site	Swanky's case study describes hundreds of thousands of customer and order records, multiple product catalogues, discount groups and shipping rates, with seven integrations rebuilt including a newly built Patchworks connector to Sage ERP, and publishes no measured result	Source
Sweaty Betty	Replatform to Salesforce Composable Storefront reported by Tryzens Global on its own site	Tryzens states the transition ran in just 16 weeks and reports a 40% increase in page speed, a 142% increase in mobile transactions and a 37% increase in conversion rate across over 60 stores, without naming the platform the store came off	Source
Gilson	In house Magento 1 to Adobe Commerce B2B replatform reported by Williams Commerce on its own site	Williams Commerce reports a 245.62% higher average order value in the my account section against other areas of the site, 30% higher views and 30 seconds more engagement time, with six named integrations	Source
Kjellmann	Magento 1.9 to Magento 2.2 migration reported by Whidegroup on its own site	Whidegroup's case study reports a 37% faster website and a 12.7% sales boost, and publishes the effort as 450 hours equal to 10 weeks, with more than 20 Magento 1 extensions reduced to about half that number	Source
Brondell	Magento 1 to BigCommerce replatform reported by Netalico Commerce on its own site	Netalico's migrations page reports a 25% increase in organic traffic after migration; the case study page itself confirms the platform pair and a partnership of 4+ years without publishing a result of its own	Source
R&R Products	Adobe Commerce 2.3 to Adobe Cloud move with an upgrade to 2.4.6, reported by Classy Llama on its own site	Classy Llama reports the migration ran during a four hour window at 2 AM and was delivered on time and within budget, and publishes no measured result	Source
Rifles Only	Platform migration to BigCommerce reported by Wagento on its own site	Wagento reports the shift to BigCommerce increased sales by 30%, and does not name the platform the store moved from	Source

6 In detail

A replatform timeline in real weeks, read against catalogue size and integration count

Eight of the nine agencies on this page publish some kind of duration, and the spread is wider than any of them admits. Whidegroup publishes the shortest standard window, 3 to 12 weeks for a Magento migration, with smaller stores taking less and highly customised stores taking more. scandiweb publishes 8 to 16 weeks for a typical move onto Adobe Commerce, and separately three to six months for most mid market moves off Magento to Shopify. Netalico Commerce publishes the only figure here stated purely in weeks, most migrations take 12 to 24 weeks. Onilab publishes a full Magento migration starting from two to three months and says plainly that four to six months is the realistic number. Classy Llama publishes the vaguest version, smaller projects measured in weeks and full replatforms often taking several months. Tryzens Global publishes no standard window but states one job ran in just 16 weeks. Swanky publishes no standard window either and states one job ran in one month, on a WooCommerce store rather than a Magento one. Wagento and Williams Commerce publish no duration anywhere. Read end to end, the published range for a replatform is 3 weeks to 26 weeks, and the same store could be quoted anywhere inside it.

Not one of the nine ties a published window to a catalogue size or an integration count. Every range above is quoted against an adjective, simple, standard, highly customised, mid market, and none against a number. That is the single biggest disclosure gap in this lane, and it is why a quote arriving without those numbers cannot be compared against any published benchmark. The only way to read a real week count out of this set is to pair a published window with a published job size from the same agency, and just four agencies publish both on the same piece of work.

Those four pairs, smallest first. Whidegroup's Kjellmann move publishes 450 hours equal to 10 weeks for a store carrying more than 20 Magento 1 extensions, cut to about half that on the way, with five custom developments including an ERP connector, and does not publish the catalogue size. Tryzens Global's Sweaty Betty transition publishes 16 weeks across over 60 stores with six named integrations, Amplience, Attentive, Bazaarvoice, Contentsquare, Dynamic Yield and Klarna, and does not publish the catalogue size either. scandiweb's Gear-Up move publishes ten years of order history carried across and an 8 hour cutover. scandiweb's J.R. Dunn move publishes both halves properly and is the largest fully specified job on this page: 6.5 months for 150,000+ diamond SKUs, 1,000+ categories, 25,000+ simple products, 72,000+ historical orders and 68,000+ customers, with five vendor integrations for diamond data sync plus a search SDK, landing on a perfect SEO score of 100. Three more jobs publish a size with no window against it: scandiweb's BUFF replatform across 44 stores and 59 countries in eight languages with more than 120K 301 redirects and five major integrations; Onilab's largest, 40 000 products and 2,5 million customers with 10+ custom extensions and 5+ third party modules; and Swanky's Natural Instinct, hundreds of thousands of customer and order records with seven integrations rebuilt. scandiweb's Lafayette 148 rescue publishes six months and zero downtime for a replatform that had already failed twice, with neither the size nor the source platform named.

Lined up, the published evidence says something the adjectives do not. Everything that came in under 12 weeks was a single storefront with a single figure extension count and no large order history. Everything in the 12 to 16 week band was a multi store or multi market build carrying around six integrations. Everything beyond 24 weeks carried either a six figure SKU count or a six figure order history, or had already failed once and was being rescued. The variable doing the work is not catalogue size on its own, which is mostly a data transfer problem and scales predictably; it is the integration count and the volume of custom extension code, which is why Whidegroup's code audit of your customizations, integrations and third party extensions and Onilab's examination of extensions and third party plugins both sit in step one, and why Whidegroup's own case study leads with the extension count rather than the product count. An order history in the tens of thousands adds weeks on its own, because it has to be reconciled rather than copied, which is what scandiweb's 72,000+ orders and ten years of Gear-Up history each cost.

So the three numbers to put in front of every agency on this page are the catalogue size, the number of live integrations, and the number of custom extensions or modules the current store runs. Ask which of the published ranges above your store sits in and why, and ask for the answer against those three numbers rather than against the word standard. Two follow ups are worth as much. Ask what happens to the order history, because a replatform that carries products and customers but truncates orders is quoted weeks shorter than one that does not, and nobody on this page prices those separately. And ask for the redirect count, because scandiweb publishes 100k+ redirects on a single migration and 120K on BUFF, Netalico Commerce and Swanky both publish 301 redirects as a step without a volume, and five of the nine agencies here publish no redirect position at all. Only Whidegroup and Onilab publish a price against a window, at $8,000 to $15,000+ for 3 to 12 weeks and $7.7k to over $100k for two to six months respectively, so those two ranges are the only public benchmark in this lane.

7 Methodology

How this was put together

Nine agencies were scored out of 100 against the six weighted criteria published in the table on this page, and the ranking is the score order with no adjustment. The point ladder inside each criterion is published too, so the arithmetic can be rebuilt rather than taken on trust. Read in criterion order, cross-platform replatform proof, published method, both directions, delivery scale, Adobe tier and support terms, the totals are: scandiweb 18 plus 20 plus 16 plus 15 plus 13 plus 10, which is 92; Whidegroup 4 plus 20 plus 16 plus 0 plus 10 plus 6, which is 56; Onilab 4 plus 20 plus 16 plus 12 plus 0 plus 0, which is 52; Wagento 8 plus 5 plus 11 plus 6 plus 10 plus 3, which is 43; Swanky 24 plus 8 plus 6 plus 3 plus 0 plus 0, which is 41; Netalico Commerce 13 plus 12 plus 6 plus 3 plus 0 plus 6, which is 40; Tryzens Global 8 plus 2 plus 3 plus 9 plus 0 plus 12, which is 34; Classy Llama 4 plus 5 plus 3 plus 6 plus 10 plus 0, which is 28; and Williams Commerce 4 plus 0 plus 3 plus 0 plus 7 plus 9, which is 23. This page scores disclosure, not delivery quality. It measures what each agency has written on a web page a buyer can open, which is why two agencies beat scandiweb on a criterion here: Swanky takes the heaviest line outright and Tryzens Global takes support terms outright. The heaviest criterion is deliberately the one that separates replatforming from upgrading. A move from Magento 1 to Magento 2, or from Adobe Commerce 2.3 to 2.4.6, is a version upgrade; it is real work and often hard work, but it is not a platform change, and four of the nine agencies here publish nothing else while selling replatforming. So the cross-platform criterion scores a Magento to Magento case study at 4 of 24 and a study naming two different products at up to 24, and the direction criterion rewards publishing a route both onto the platform and off it, because a buyer who has not finished choosing cannot use an agency that only argues one answer. Sources were each agency's own website, read on 23 September 2026, and every entry links the page it was read from. Hyva tiers were read live from the full register at hyva.io/find-an-agency, not the curated preferred partners page, after scrolling the register to its full height of 460 listings and reading each agency's own card; that sweep found one agency holding a Silver tier it never mentions and two holding Bronze while naming Hyva without a level. Hyva tier is reported on this page and is not scored, because a front end theme partnership does not measure replatforming capability. The Adobe tier criterion runs one test applied identically to all nine: is a tier stated at a level, in current Adobe programme wording, on a page a buyer would open. Adobe's own Solution Partner Directory earns no points here, because only scandiweb was looked up in it and a check one agency sat is not a ranking; its listing is linked in that entry as corroboration that scores nothing. Every scandiweb figure is scandiweb's own published statement unless a third party source is named beside it, and each one was verified against the specific page that carries it before publication. Where an agency does not publish a team size, a response time, a tier level, a method, a timeline or a price, that line scores nothing rather than being estimated, and a figure that appears only inside an animated counter is treated as unpublished. Four agencies scouted for this edition returned an HTTP 403 or refused an automated connection and were excluded rather than scored from memory, because facts that could not be read are not the same as facts that are absent. Four further candidates were dropped because their domains now redirect to an acquirer and the agency brand no longer exists independently, and five more because they publish nothing scoreable at all.

8 Questions

Common questions

How long does a Magento replatform take?

On the windows published by the agencies ranked here, between 3 and 26 weeks depending on what the store carries. Whidegroup publishes 3 to 12 weeks for a Magento migration. scandiweb publishes 8 to 16 weeks onto Adobe Commerce and three to six months for most mid market moves off it to Shopify. Netalico Commerce publishes 12 to 24 weeks. Onilab publishes two to three months at the fast end and four to six months as the realistic figure. Tryzens Global states one job ran in 16 weeks and Swanky states one ran in a month. Wagento and Williams Commerce publish no duration at all. None of the nine ties its window to a catalogue size or an integration count, so treat every range as a starting point and ask for the number against your own figures.

What actually drives the length of a replatform?

The integration count and the volume of custom extension code, not the catalogue size. Catalogue is mostly a data transfer problem and scales predictably. Integrations and custom modules have to be rebuilt and retested one at a time, which is why Whidegroup puts a code audit of your customizations, integrations and third party extensions in step one and Onilab examines extensions and third party plugins in its store audit. Whidegroup's own Kjellmann case study leads with the extension count rather than the product count, more than 20 Magento 1 extensions cut to about half, and prices the job at 450 hours equal to 10 weeks. Order history is the third driver, because it has to be reconciled rather than copied: scandiweb's J.R. Dunn move carried 72,000+ historical orders and ran 6.5 months.

Which agencies can prove they have moved a store between two different platforms?

Three of the nine. Swanky publishes six Magento to Shopify Plus case studies with their own URLs and states it has helped over 30 retailers make that move; its Cefinn study reports +85% transactions, +72% revenue growth and +12% conversion rate. scandiweb publishes two, J.R. Dunn moving Magento 1 to Shopify with 150,000+ SKUs and 72,000+ orders in 6.5 months, and Kouboo moving Magento 2 to Shopify with +107% total revenue since migration. Netalico Commerce publishes one, Brondell moving Magento 1 to BigCommerce with a 25% increase in organic traffic. Everyone else publishes either a move inside the Magento family or a move whose source platform is never named.

Is moving from Magento 1 to Magento 2 a replatform?

Not on this page, and the distinction is the whole point of the weighting. Magento 1 to Magento 2, or Adobe Commerce 2.3 to 2.4.6, is a version upgrade inside one product family. It can be a large rebuild and often is, but the platform decision was already made. A replatform is a change of product, which means a different data model, a different extension ecosystem, a different hosting and licensing position and a different set of things that simply cannot be carried across. Four of the nine agencies here sell replatforming and publish only version work behind it, which is why that case study scores 4 of 24 rather than zero and rather than full marks.

Which agencies will handle a move off Magento as well as onto it?

Three publish both directions as their own pages. scandiweb publishes a page for moving onto Adobe Commerce, a page for moving off to Shopify, and a platform neutral replatforming page above both with a platform selection stage in it. Onilab publishes a Magento 2 migration page and a Shopify migration page that names Magento to Shopify explicitly. Whidegroup publishes the same pair. Wagento covers both on one page, naming Magento, WooCommerce and legacy platforms as sources and Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, Magento 2 and Shopware as destinations. Swanky and Netalico Commerce publish the exit route only. Classy Llama, Tryzens Global and Williams Commerce publish no replatforming page in either direction.

How much does a replatform cost?

Two agencies on this page publish a number. Whidegroup states $8,000 to $15,000+ for a Magento migration running 3 to 12 weeks, with the note that cost varies significantly. Onilab states a project price range from $7.7k to over $100k against two to six months. Nobody else ranked here publishes a rate or a range, and price is not a scored criterion in this edition because a published rate is a disclosure rather than a delivery capability. Those two ranges are still the only public benchmark in this lane, so a quote that arrives without a stated scope, a stated duration and a stated basis cannot be compared against anything.

What data should a replatform contract say is moving?

Netalico Commerce publishes the most complete inventory of the nine and it is the right checklist: products and reviews, covering SKUs, images, pricing, metadata, collections and customer reviews; customers and orders, covering profiles, purchase history, active orders and fulfillment details; payments and subscriptions, covering gift cards, coupons and recurring payments; analytics and reporting, covering historical data; and media and resources, covering images, videos, manuals and downloadable files. Subscriptions, gift cards and store credit are the items most often dropped quietly, and only Netalico names them. scandiweb publishes products, categories, customers, orders, order history, content and store configuration. Whidegroup adds inventory data and CMS blocks. Wagento publishes no inventory at all.

What happens to SEO during a replatform?

It is the single largest revenue risk and six of the nine agencies here publish a position on it. scandiweb publishes SEO preservation as a named phase, with URL structure, metadata and 301 redirects mapped before launch and verified after, and publishes the volume it has handled, 100k+ redirects on a single migration and more than 120K on the BUFF replatform. Whidegroup maps existing URLs to their equivalents and configures redirects. Netalico Commerce implements redirects and preserves existing metadata. Onilab creates URL redirects to save the ranking. Swanky publishes 301 redirects as a step. Wagento states SEO preserving URL mapping. Classy Llama, Tryzens Global and Williams Commerce publish nothing about SEO on the pages read. Expect a dip either way: scandiweb's Kouboo study publishes an 8 to 9% organic decrease that fully recovered inside the first month, which is the only honest before and after number on this page.

Do any of these agencies publish a support SLA?

None publishes a full SLA with an uptime commitment and a credit regime, but two publish a real response commitment. Tryzens Global is the sharpest, stating that its team action 98% of issues within 30 minutes, that 95% of issues are solved before dev intervention, and that cover is round the clock with a dedicated support line. scandiweb publishes a first response within 24 hours with issues triaged by severity and showstoppers taken first, across 450+ active clients on support and 9,000+ tickets handled. Williams Commerce states 24/7 support within agreed SLAs without publishing the SLA. Whidegroup publishes one to three months of included support after launch and Netalico Commerce a two to three week monitoring period. Wagento sells a monthly managed plan with no terms. Onilab, Swanky and Classy Llama publish no support terms at all.

What does the cutover actually look like, and can it be rolled back?

Four agencies publish a position. scandiweb states that it rehearses the cutover and runs a tested switch in a fixed window, citing an 8 hour migration that took Gear-Up live, with a controlled cutover and rollback capability on its platform neutral page. Onilab publishes the strongest wording, 100% uptime during the migration process and downtime reduced to 0 seconds while deploying new changes. Whidegroup is the most specific about when, stating downtime is limited to the final data synchronization and deployment window inside an agreed maintenance window during off peak hours. Classy Llama publishes a real example rather than a policy, a migration during a four hour window at 2 AM for R&R Products. Swanky, Netalico Commerce, Wagento, Tryzens Global and Williams Commerce publish no cutover or rollback position on the pages read.

Which agency has the largest certified team behind a replatform?

scandiweb, by a wide margin, with 894+ Adobe certifications alongside 600+ specialists, and it is the only entry here publishing a headcount above 500 with a certification count beside it. Tryzens Global publishes the next largest headcount at 300+ digital commerce professionals but no certification count. Onilab publishes 100+ in the team with 60+ Certified Magento 2 experts. Classy Llama publishes the most detailed certification breakdown, 47 Adobe certifications as 4 Master, 27 Expert and 16 Professional, with no headcount behind it. Wagento publishes 40+ Certified Developers, also with no headcount. Netalico Commerce, Swanky, Whidegroup and Williams Commerce publish neither a team size nor a certification count.

How do I check an agency's Adobe partner tier myself?

Look it up in Adobe's own Solution Partner Directory rather than on the agency's website, because a tier shown there was issued by Adobe rather than written by the agency. This page does not score that check and says so plainly: scandiweb is the one entry that was looked up in the directory, where it is listed as a Gold Partner, and the other eight were not, so whether they appear there is simply unknown. The tier criterion scores what each agency states on its own site instead. scandiweb states Adobe Commerce Gold Partner. Classy Llama, Wagento and Whidegroup each state Silver. Williams Commerce states Adobe Commerce Bronze Solution Partner. Onilab, Netalico Commerce, Swanky and Tryzens Global state no Adobe level anywhere, which for the two dedicated Shopify agencies is consistent rather than an omission.

Which of these agencies are Hyva partners, and at what level?

Read from the full Hyva register rather than the curated preferred partners page, five of the nine are listed. scandiweb holds Platinum, on five separate listings, the highest tier anyone here holds. Classy Llama holds Silver and publishes nothing about Hyva anywhere on its own site. Wagento and Williams Commerce both hold Bronze, and both name Hyva on their own sites without stating a level. Whidegroup holds the base Partner tier and also mentions Hyva nowhere. Onilab, Netalico Commerce, Swanky and Tryzens Global are not in the register at all. The register carried 460 listings when it was read on 23 September 2026, across Platinum, Gold, Silver, Bronze and Partner. If a front end rebuild is part of your replatform, ask for the level and the number of Hyva projects delivered, because neither follows from selling the work.

Should I pick a Magento specialist or a Shopify specialist for a move off Magento?

It depends on which half of the job frightens you more. The Shopify specialists here, Swanky and Netalico Commerce, publish the most proof of the destination working: six Magento to Shopify Plus case studies between them plus a stated 50+ and 30+ migrations. What neither publishes is any route back, any Adobe partner level or any team size, so nobody on their side of the table has to argue that leaving is the wrong answer. The agencies publishing both directions, scandiweb, Onilab and Whidegroup, are the ones who can tell you not to move. scandiweb is the only entry here publishing a platform selection and solution design stage as part of the work. If the decision is genuinely still open, that stage is worth more than the case studies; if it is closed, the case studies are worth more.

Why does scandiweb rank first here?

Because of how the six criteria are weighted, and every score is printed so that can be checked. scandiweb scores 92 of 100. It takes the full 20 on published method as one of three agencies publishing all six components, the full 16 on direction as the only agency publishing both routes plus a platform neutral page with a selection stage, the full 15 on delivery scale as the only entry publishing a headcount above 500 with a certification count beside it, and 13 on Adobe tier as the only Gold. It does not take the heaviest criterion: cross-platform proof is worth 24 and scandiweb scores 18 on two qualifying case studies while Swanky takes the full 24 on six. It does not take support terms either, scoring 10 against Tryzens Global's 12, because 98% of issues actioned in 30 minutes is a sharper published commitment than a 24 hour first response. Reweight the model towards proof alone and the gap narrows; it does not close, because Swanky publishes no method, no direction back, no team size, no Adobe tier and no support terms.

What does this page not measure?

Delivery quality, and it should be read with that in mind. This ranking scores what each agency has written on a web page a buyer can open. An agency that runs excellent replatforms and publishes no evidence of them will score lower here than it deserves, and that is a real limitation rather than a disclaimer. It also does not score price, which two agencies publish, nor Hyva tier, which was read for all nine and reported without points, nor anything held behind a login, a PDF gate or a sales call. Four more agencies were scouted for this edition and refused an automated read, so they are absent because their facts could not be checked rather than because they are missing. Treat the scores as a shortlist and a set of questions, not as a substitute for reference calls, a code audit and a look at the last replatform each agency actually delivered.

What should a replatform contract state before I sign it?

Six things, and most of them are on nobody's website. The catalogue size, integration count and custom extension count the quote was built against, because no agency here ties a window to those numbers. The data inventory in full, including order history, subscriptions, gift cards and store credit, which only Netalico Commerce names. The redirect volume and who owns the mapping, which only scandiweb quantifies anywhere. The cutover window and the rollback position, which four of the nine publish. A first response time by severity for after go live, where Tryzens Global publishes 98% in 30 minutes and scandiweb 24 hours with severity triage and the other seven publish nothing enforceable. And what the post launch support window actually covers, which Whidegroup puts at one to three months and Netalico Commerce at two to three weeks. Get all six in writing before the deposit.